Saturday, March 2, 2013
Newcomers vs Long-time Residents
Some commenters on Dean Ward's blog think its perfectly okay for a newcomer to get elected to our council, riding in on an establishment mayor's back after living here at the time for only two years, who is on record through a letter to the editor before the last election telling one and all how wonderful things were here in the Pass, only to once getting elected working to change everything here according to the way things were from where he came. That is, the big city.
When I arrived in the Pass as a newcomer it took me four years before I threw my hat in the ring. In getting elected, I spent the next three years of my term learning about the people and my community here, and what a great experience it was. For in those three short years, I met and got to know more people during that time that without being on council I doubt 30-40 years of living here would I have been able to do so. I also got to know my community... what made it tick. From this experience, and now having lived here for almost two decades, I believe I now have a firm understanding of how both my community and its people think, feel and what they want. In other words, how and why it ticks the way it does. This understanding took years in the making, with the help of a term on council.
How presumptuous and arrogant then for those ignorant of their surroundings here because of their recent arrival to dictate to those they really know nothing about. Makes me think about a book I read many years ago called 'The Ugly American'. The subject is about diplomacy and foreign relations, how Russia for example schools and educates their diplomats in the culture and language of a people, their customs and ways, etc. before sending them into any given foreign land. Whereas, the Americans send in a big tall Texan who ignorant of where he has been sent sits down, places his cowboy boots on the hosts desk and immediately starts dictating to them on how things are going to be. Y'all hear!
Our council is that ugly American and we here in the Pass have been made to feel and been treated by this council, and especially by the newcomers on this council, as some backward hicks in the sticks that don't know our ass from a hole in the ground. There are reasons for why things are the way they are here and why they have stayed that way for so long. Thinking you as a newcomer know better than the local yokels, treating people here like they were a bunch of dumb hillbillies needing to be 'edumacated' and brought into the 21st century, whether they liked it or not, is not the way to go about building community. Because you and a couple of other newcomers on council, along with a returning prodigal and wayward son, in league with unworldly, naive individuals more impressed with letters after a man's name than with his character and life experience, managed to get elected, does not give you carte blanche to push forward your own misguided and irresponsible agenda in record time that has not been bought into by those you were elected to serve. What gall to think and do otherwise! What arrogance! What stupidity and naivety!
Some times you have to pay your dues and learn the ropes before you dive into situations you know nothing about. Newcomers on council have a tendency of doing the latter before the former. As a result, as with this council, we are all now paying the price with the ongoing destruction of our community and the stifling and killing of its spirit.
Its time to step back and take an accounting of what you have done. Its time to hold that Town Hall Meeting you promised for last year that you have been postponing for almost a year now, in your fear of being held accountable by those who placed you where you are (and can soon remove you as well). Its time to stop delaying the inevitable and hear for yourself that the majority in this community are not happy with your governance, and want you to address the error of your ways.
In closing, let me just say, newcomers (of which many still today would say I am one) on council should put in at least one term in order to learn who its people are they are representing, and what their community is all about before taking a wrecking ball to the place is what I am saying here. You have got to learn to walk before you can run. Some members of our current council in their zeal to do right by this community have instead made a mess of things but maybe its still not to late to turn back the clock and to make right that which has been made wrong. It just takes a little character and intestinal fortitude to admit your mistakes, and do what must be done.
p.s. It seems like at least one councillor has distanced himself from the pack (see quote below) but to-date has failed to publicly say so, except by his absence. Will more follow suit? Or will they all choose to stubbornly go down with the ship, rather than admit they have been wrong? Time will tell? But time is running out...
When you have to start compromising yourself or your morals for the people around you, it’s probably time to change the people around you.
Labels:
Blog,
Council,
Crowsnest Pass,
Dean Ward,
long-time residents,
newcomers,
Town Hall Meeting
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





14 comments:
how do you explain the "long term residents" on council now?
seems to me they all voted the same way.
John, We are getting close to re-election time and these people will promise us anything to get re-elected. They have shown us what they are all about. Let us NOT make another mistake and re-elect any of them again.
I do not think the time spent in residency has anything to do with who gets voted in. Everyone needs to put their best foot forward, and then let democracy prevail and let the people decide. Sometimes people really don't want things continually pushed on them. I think everyone feels they can make their own decision - right or wrong.
I believe there is a place on council for short and long term residents of the community. They both offer the public a different perspective on matters. The Mayor however should have some experience at working with people, groups, volunteers etc. This council is proof that you dont get a guarantee that either will work out in the best interests of the public. You would think that councillers Mitchell, Londsbury and Gail would help offset some of the more bussiness like councillers in Gallant,Saindon and Saje. As it turns out either they are puppets for the "MARE" or never did have a feel for the community. Some of the decisions they made right from the begining when they were going to uproot those residents from their mobile homes along the river in Blairmore just left a person shaking your head. What kind of people could spend that much time in a community and let that be their first course of action as a counciller. It was a prelude of things to come and they have continued on that downward spiral ever since. You are right in saying that the more experience that you have in dealing with the residents the better counciller or Mayor you "should" be.
I think Peter what I was trying to get across is newcomer councillors especially should not be so quick to jump in and try to change things here simply for the sake of change because they think it makes sense or would be a good thing, without first talking with the locals to find out what they think, as it is they who will bear the brunt of their decisions.
Simply talking to like-minded newcomers, or following the lead of self-anointed crusaders out to make a name for themselves having hidden agendas, isn't a good idea either.
Taking the time to know the people and the community is the best way to go. Sometimes you can learn more from the local coffee shop than you can at a board meeting of your peers.
JP
A "Town Hall Meeting" would be a Magnificent 7 campaign rally at taxpayers expense, chaired by Himself's Worship.
I'd like a "Town Hall Meeting" without the "bodyguards", just so's we can "boo" a bit without being escorted out. I ejected myself from the one in June, out of disgust.
PLM
John you mentioned that one councillor has distanced himself from the pack in absentia. Perhaps a few more should follow suit but only by public disqualification. To begin this can be done by notifying the minister of pecuniary interests practiced by one councillor. The Sinister 7 comes with its own rewards and is held using municipal camping areas gratis and the rest is done by volunteers but the pecuniary interests are garnered by the promoter. Check this out if you have any doubts. If disqualification takes place the councillor or councillors in question cannot run for office ever again.
John I disagree with your analysis of the problems with our present council and do not think it has anything to do with "newcomer Councilors". Anom 1:15 raises an unanswered question "how do you explain the "long term residents" on Council now?" Our declining community located in a beautiful major mountain pass in a booming province took decades to getting to this diminished state. Unfortunately this Council's high handed conduct will not offer any real answers. Lack of an expensive administrative hierarchy will not bring prosperity. Suggesting newcomers do not understand the nuances of our community does not take us to the hard questions of we have not attracted prosperity.
Prospterity left when the mine closed in Coleman. It forced many families to leave the Pass. Yes the Pass is beautiful, but so are many little communities in the mountains. There are not enough jobs and the taxes and utilities have sky rocketed with this administration. If it wasn't for all the old people getting their old age pensions in the Pass, it would be worse here. I think that the pensioners are the only ones keeping this place afloat, but not for long as we cannot afford the rising cost of living and supporting this bloated administration.
Anon @1:15
Except for the last council, don't they always?
Anon @10:49
The question of morals or ethics with respect to Gallant's Sinister 7 is not for me to answer, but I'm pretty sure he excuses himself when he needs to and that he is careful in what he does in the areas of pecuniary interests. If not, I'm sure this would have come up a long time ago.
Some may think of him as being self-serving, and that he maybe, but he's not stupid and I for one will not call into question either his honesty or his integrity.
Anon @12:14
I'm not asking you to agree, just stating what I believe to be true that newcomers should not be so quick to change things they know nothing about until they do, is all I'm saying.
For me the question on why this community has not attracted prosperity is simple. We had a former mayor who with his cronies and for self-serving reasons of their own, who being in positions of power, influence and authority, and wanting to maintain the status quo, did just that. The saying “it is better to be a big fish in a small pond that a small fish in a big pond” was their mantra and philosophy and the reason why our neighbours grew while we having as much as them if not more did not.
Newcomers most likely would not know this, as obviously you don’t because you asked a question you should have known the answer to? Which just goes to make my point again, newcomers like Gallant and his associates should have taken the time to learn about the people and the community, before they started taking a wrecking ball to it.
Anon @12:58
Good comment and one this council should take have taken note of before saddling people here with the burden of their largess and class ignorance as to the demographic make-up of this community.
JP
If the jobs and the prosperity are not there, and the community had learned to live within its means, re the Volunteer Fire Depts, then the Mayor and Council should have proceeded with that in mind. Jumping into the 21st Century without regard for costs, except to raise "revenue" by introducing creative means, is ridiculous They didn't think this through and are scrambling and CYAing all the time. Now they need more time to "finish the job they started"?
Yes they need more time to totally destroy the Pass, not that they didn't try hard enough.
"The question of morals or ethics with respect to Gallant's Sinister 7 is not for me to answer, but I'm pretty sure he excuses himself when he needs to and that he is careful in what he does in the areas of pecuniary interests."
It's also an issue of transparency. They are also supposed to disclose the "general nature" of their pecuniary interest:
http://www.municipalaffairs.alberta.ca/documents/msb/conflict_of_interest_2010(1).pdf
Several have failed to do this properly. See MGA 174-178:
http://www.qp.alberta.ca/1266.cfm?page=m26.cfm&leg_type=Acts&isbncln=9780779756155&display=html
Post a Comment